PEPGEN P-15
Received Apr 13, 2007 · Event occurred Oct 18, 2006
Report 1721411-2007-00078 · MDR key 840931
Device
Generic name
Npz
Manufacturer
Dentsply Friadent CeramedModel number
NACatalog number
99U000-102
Lot number
UNK
Product problems
- Explanted
- Loose
- Failure to Osseointegrate
Patient
47 YR
- Surgical procedure
Narrative
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
FAILURE TO OSSEOINTEGRATE, WHILE UNCOMMON, IS AN INHERENT RISK OF THE PROCEDURE KNOWN TO DOCTOR AND PATIENT BEFORE THE PROCEDURE IS INITIATED AND IS DEPENDENT ON MANY FACTORS INCLUDING THE PT'S AGE, SEX, HEALTH, AND SOCIAL HISTORY (WHICH APPEAR TO BE UNREMARKABLE), THE TYPE AND SIZE OF THE DEFECT BEING GRAFTED, OCCURRENCE OF SITE PREPARATION TRAUMA (HEAT OR PRESSURE) RESULTING IN NECROSIS OR SCARRING AND FIBROSIS, PRIMARILY STABILITY OF THE IMPLANT (SECONDARY TO BONE QUALITY AND/OR EXCESSIVE PREPARATION OF OSTEOTOMY), AND GRAFT PLACEMENT TECHNIQUE. THOUGH PEPGEN WILL REMODEL TO BONE AT A SIMILAR RATE AS NATURAL BONE IN A PT, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DETERMINE THE SPECIFIC RESORPTION RATE OF ANY BONE GRAFTING MATERIAL; MATERIAL PLACED IN AN AREA OF LOW VASCULARITY AND LITTLE OSTEOGENIC POTENTIAL WILL TAKE MUCH LONGER TO REMODEL TO BONE THAN IF PLACED IN A MORE ACTIVE SITE. FROM THE INFO PROVIDED, IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DETERMINE IF THE IMPLANT OR GRAFT WAS THE ETIOLOGY OF FAILURE, THOUGH IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE GAFTING MATERIAL MALFUNCTIONED. THE IMPLANT LOSS WILL BE REPORTED VIA ASR. THE DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION AND THE LOT NUMBER IS NOT KNOWN FOR RETAINED-PRODUCT TESTING AND/OR DHR REVIEW.
Description of Event or Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PEPGEN P-15 WAS USED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE UPPER RIGHT ANTERIOR MAXILLA WITH UNKNOWN BONE QUALITY TYPE AND FAIR ORAL HYGEINE. THE OSTEOTOMY WAS PREPARED VIA DRILLING AND HEALING WAS SUBGINGIVAL FOR A TWO-STAGE TREATMENT APPROACH. THE IMPLANT DID NOT OSSEOINTEGRATE AND DEMONSTRATED MOBILITY PRIOR TO BEING EXPLANTED APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS POST-PLACEMENT. IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE GRAFT INTEGRATED WITH THE SURROUNDING VITAL BONE OR IF IT ALSO FAILED WITH THE IMPLANT ALTHOUGH THE HEALING TIME IS TOO SHORT TO EXPECT COMPLETE INTEGRATION. IT IS ALSO NOT CLEAR WHY GRAFTING WAS PERFORMED. (I.E. BONY DEHISCENCE, IMMEDIATE PLACEMENT). AS A RESULT, IT CAN BE PRESUMED THAT ANOTHER SURGICAL PROCEDURE WOULD BE NECESSARY TO ACHIEVE THE DESIRED RESULTS AND PRECLUDE PERMANENT DAMAGE TO A BODY STRUCTURE THAT WOULD NOT BE TRIVIAL.