PHASIX MESH

Additional Manufacturer Narrative

NO CONCLUSIONS CAN BE MADE. THE PATIENT'S ATTORNEY ALLEGES ADVERSE PATIENT OUTCOME ASSOCIATED WITH THE HERNIA MESH USED TO TREAT THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT'S ATTORNEY ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT HAD SUBSEQUENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION; HOWEVER, NO DETAILS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED. NO LOT NUMBER HAS BEEN PROVIDED; THEREFORE, A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS IS NOT POSSIBLE. NOTE, THE DATE OF EVENT (15-JUN-2026) IS CONSIDERED TO BE THE BEST ESTIMATE BASED ON THE DATE OF AWARENESS. THIS EMDR REPRESENTS THE PHASIX MESH (DEVICE 2). AN ADDITIONAL EMDR WAS SUBMITTED TO REPRESENT THE VENTRALEX ST MESH (DEVICE 1). SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE PROVIDED, A SUPPLEMENTAL EMDR WILL BE SUBMITTED. NOTE: SECTION A THROUGH F - THE INFORMATION PROVIDED BY BD REPRESENTS ALL OF THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT / REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BD.

Description of Event or Problem

ATTORNEY ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY FOR IMPLANT OF AN UNSPECIFIED BARD/DAVOL VENTRALEX ST AND PHASIX MESH ON (B)(6) 2015 AND/OR (B)(6) 2024. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT IS MAKING A CLAIM FOR AN ADVERSE PATIENT OUTCOME AGAINST THE VENTRALEX ST AND PHASIX MESH. ATTORNEY ALLEGES THAT THE PATIENT HAD SUBSEQUENT SURGICAL INTERVENTION DUE TO THE HERNIA MESH DEVICE. IT IS ALSO ALLEGED THAT THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED EMOTIONAL DISTRESS AND THE DEVICE WAS DEFECTIVE.