REAMER HANDLE

Additional Manufacturer Narrative

H11: INTERNAL COMPLAINT REFERENCE: CASE-(B)(4). H3, H6 THIS COMPLAINT WAS OPENED BY SMITH+NEPHEW TO DOCUMENT A PATIENT COMPLICATION REPORTED THAT INCLUDES REFERENCE TO THE USE OF A SMITH+NEPHEW PRODUCT WITHOUT EVIDENCE ABOUT A SPECIFIC PRODUCT PROBLEM. THE REPORTED COMPLICATION RELATES TO KNOWN INHERENT PROCEDURAL RISKS THAT ARE APPROPRIATELY DOCUMENTED IN OUR RISK FILES. SMITH+NEPHEW WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR TRENDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR POST-MARKET SURVEILLANCE PROCESS AND TAKE NECESSARY ACTION AS REQUIRED IF ANTICIPATED SEVERITY AND/OR OCCURRENCE RATES ARE EXCEEDED. SMITH+NEPHEW HAS NO REASON TO SUSPECT THAT THE PRODUCT FAILED TO MEET ANY SPECIFICATIONS AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE. BASED ON OUR REVIEW OF ALL CURRENTLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION, WE ARE UNABLE TO CONFIRM A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE REPORTED EVENT AND THE DEVICE OR IDENTIFY A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE. HOWEVER, AS THE USE OF OUR PRODUCT CANNOT BE EXCLUDED AS A POTENTIAL CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTORY FACTOR TO THE REPORTED ISSUE, WE ARE SUBMITTING THIS REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. IF ADDITIONAL INVESTIGATIVE FINDINGS OR INFORMATION BECOMES AVAILABLE THAT ALTERS THE CONCLUSIONS OF THIS REPORT, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED.

Description of Event or Problem

IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A THR SURGERY, THE REAMER HANDLE BROKE UPON REAMING. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING AN EQUIVALENT S+N BACK-UP DEVICE. PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS PROBLEM.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative

THE ASSOCIATED DEVICE WAS RETURNED AND EVALUATED. THE VISUAL INSPECTION REVEALED THAT RETURNED HEAVILY WORN FROM USE, WITH THE DISTAL THREADED TIP FRACTURED OFF WITH NO MATERIAL RETURNED. THE PRODUCT IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION PROVIDED, BATCH NUMBER AND PART NUMBER, DID NOT MATCH ANY KNOWN RELEASE OF THIS PART AND THUS A MANUFACTURING RECORD REVIEW COULD NOT BE CONDUCTED. ALSO, THE COMPLAINT HISTORY REVIEW WAS PERFORMED ON PRODUCT NUMBER ONLY, A REVIEW OF COMPLAINT HISTORY FOR THE PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS DID NOT REVEAL SIMILAR EVENTS FOR THE LISTED DEVICE. A REVIEW OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT FILE REVEALED THIS FAILURE MODE WAS PREVIOUSLY IDENTIFIED. THE ANTICIPATED RISK LEVEL IS STILL ADEQUATE. A HISTORICAL REVIEW CONCLUDED THAT THERE ARE NO PRIOR ACTIONS RELATED TO THIS PRODUCT AND EVENT. AT THIS TIME, WE HAVE NO EVIDENCE TO CONCLUDE THAT THE PRODUCT FAILED TO MEET ANY SPECIFICATIONS AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE. THIS DEVICE IS A REUSABLE INSTRUMENT THAT CAN BE EXPOSED TO NUMEROUS SURGERIES. DAMAGE FROM PROLONGED USE, MISUSE OR ROUGH HANDLING ARE LIKELY POTENTIAL FACTORS THAT COULD CONTRIBUTE TO THE REPORTED EVENT. WE RECOMMEND THAT ALL REUSABLE INSTRUMENTS BE ROUTINELY INSPECTED FOR WEAR AND DAMAGE AND REPLACED AS NECESSARY. BASED ON THIS INVESTIGATION, THE NEED FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION IS NOT INDICATED. SHOULD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE RECEIVED, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE REOPENED. NO FURTHER INVESTIGATION IS WARRANTED FOR THIS COMPLAINT; HOWEVER, WE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR FUTURE COMPLAINTS AND INVESTIGATE AS NECESSARY. WE CONSIDER THIS INVESTIGATION CLOSED.