SWAN-GANZ BIPOLAR PACING
Received Feb 19, 2026
Report 2015691-2026-11241 · MDR key 24390158
Device
Generic name
Electrode, Pacemaker, Temporary
Manufacturer
Edwards Lifesciences PrModel number
PE075F5Lot number
66224351
Product problems
- Pacing Problem
Patient
NA · Unknown
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
Narrative
Description of Event or Problem
AS REPORTED DURING USE IN A PATIENT THIS SWAN GANZ PACING CATHETER DID NOT PACE FROM THE BEGINNING OF PROCEDURE. THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED BY REPLACING THE CATHETER. THERE WAS NO ALLEGATION OF PATIENT INJURY. THE DEVICE WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
THE DEVICE EVALUATION IS ANTICIPATED. A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE FORTHCOMING WHEN THE INVESTIGATION IS COMPLETED. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW HAS NOT BEEN COMPLETED. COMPLAINT HISTORIES FOR ALL REPORTED EVENTS ARE REVIEWED AGAINST TRENDING CONTROL LIMITS ON A MONTHLY BASIS AND ANY EXCURSIONS ABOVE THE CONTROL LIMITS ARE ASSESSED AND DOCUMENTED AS A PART OF THE MONTHLY REVIEW.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
ONE SWAN GANZ PACING CATHETER WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. CUSTOMER REPORT OF DID NOT PACE WAS UNABLE TO BE CONFIRMED. NO VISIBLE DAMAGE OR ABNORMALITY WAS OBSERVED FROM CATHETER BODY, BALLOON, WINDINGS AND RETURNED SYRINGE. CONTINUITY TESTING WAS PERFORMED ON THE DISTAL AND PROXIMAL CIRCUITS AND THERE WERE NO OPEN, INTERMITTENT, OR SHORT CONDITIONS OBSERVED. THE BALLOON INFLATED CLEAR AND CONCENTRIC WITH 1.3 CC AIR AND THE BALLOON REMAINED INFLATED FOR 5 MINUTES WITHOUT LEAKAGE. THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD REVIEW WAS COMPLETED AND THE PRODUCT PASSED WITHOUT ANY NONCONFORMANCES. AS PART OF THE MANUFACTURING PROCESS 100% OF THE UNITS GO THROUGH AN ELECTRICAL INSPECTION PROCESS. THE JAPANESE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE INDICATES INSTRUCTIONS TO HANDLE THE CATHETER WITH CAUTION FOR PROPER FUNCTIONING OF THE PACING CATHETER. AN ENGINEERING EVALUATION WAS INITIATED TO ASSESS FOR ANY MANUFACTURING-RELATED PROCESSES WHICH COULD BE CORRELATED TO THE COMPLAINT. AS NO DEFECT WAS FOUND, THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS OR CONFIRMS THE FAILURE MODE IS ASSOCIATED TO A MANUFACTURING OR DESIGN DEFECT. THEREFORE, A ROOT CAUSE COULD NOT BE ESTABLISHED.