inforMED
MalfunctionPTS

CAPTURA BIOPSY FORCEPS WITHOUT SPIKE

Received Dec 19, 2025

Report 1037905-2025-00846 · MDR key 23848413

Device

Generic name

Endoscopic Grasping/cutting Instrument, Non-powered, Exempt

Model number

G47690

Catalog number

BF-2.2S-230-20

Lot number

UNKNOWN

Product problems

  • Failure to Cut
  • Failure to Cut

Patient

NA · Unknown

  • Laceration(s)
  • Laceration(s)

Narrative

Description of Event or Problem

DURING AN ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY SAMPLING, THE PHYSICIAN CHOSE A COOK CAPTURA BIOPSY FORCEPS WITHOUT SPIKE. CORRESPONDENCE FROM COOK REP STATED "I¿VE ALSO SPOKEN TO THE CUSTOMER TODAY AND THEY¿VE MENTIONED THAT OVER THE PAST THREE MONTHS DOCTORS HAVE COMMUNICATED THAT THE BIOPSY FORCEPS AREN¿T SHARP AND SOMETIMES TEAR TISSUE" AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT, OUR ATTEMPTS TO COLLECT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PATIENT OUTCOME HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL. WHILE THE COMPLAINANT DID NOT SPECIFY IF THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MEDICAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS EVENT, THE INFORMATION ABLE TO BE COLLECTED DOES NOT REASONABLY SUGGEST THE PATIENT WAS ADVERSELY IMPACTED. ADDITIONAL ATTEMPTS TO GATHER THIS INFORMATION WILL BE MADE.

Additional Manufacturer Narrative

INVESTIGATION EVALUATION: A PRODUCT EVALUATION WAS NOT PERFORMED IN RESPONSE TO THIS REPORT BECAUSE THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS NOT PROVIDED TO COOK FOR EVALUATION. THE REPORT COULD NOT BE CONFIRMED. A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORD COULD NOT BE CONDUCTED BECAUSE THE LOT NUMBER WAS NOT PROVIDED. INVESTIGATION CONCLUSION: WE COULD NOT CONDUCT A COMPLETE INVESTIGATION BECAUSE THE PRODUCT SAID TO BE INVOLVED WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. A DEFINITIVE CAUSE FOR THE REPORTED OBSERVATION COULD NOT BE DETERMINED. PRIOR TO DISTRIBUTION, ALL CAPTURA BIOPSY FORCEPS WITHOUT SPIKE ARE SUBJECTED TO A VISUAL INSPECTION AND FUNCTIONAL TESTING TO ENSURE DEVICE INTEGRITY. CORRECTIVE ACTION: BASED ON THE QUALITY ENGINEERING RISK ASSESSMENT NO CORRECTIVE ACTION IS WARRANTED AT THIS TIME. A REVIEW OF THE COMPLAINT HISTORY WAS CONDUCTED. THIS REPRESENTS AN UNUSUAL OCCURRENCE. BASED ON THIS REVIEW, THE LIKELIHOOD OF THIS TYPE OF REPORT IS REMOTE. QUALITY ASSURANCE WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR FOR COMPLAINT TRENDS.