MOTECH TITANIUM SURGICAL MESH
Received Aug 24, 1999 · Event occurred Jun 18, 1998
Report MW1017025 · MDR key 237146
Device
Generic name
Titanium Surgical Mesh Cage
Manufacturer
Depuy AcromedModel number
UNKCatalog number
UNK
Lot number
UNK
Product problems
- Explanted
- Replace
- Use of Device Problem
- Implant extrusion
Patient
45 YR
- Embolus
- Extrusion
- Hemorrhage/Blood Loss/Bleeding
- Occlusion
- Surgical procedure, repeated
- Thrombosis
- Loss of Vision
- Great Vessel Perforation
- Transfusion of blood products
- Disability
- Therapy/non-surgical treatment, additional
- Surgical procedure, additional
- Treatment with medication(s)
- Hospitalization required
Narrative
Description of Event or Problem
DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED AND WITHIN THREE WEEKS, THE DEVICE EXTRUDED INTO THE INFERIOR VENA CAVA. ON 7/31/98, PT HEMORRHAGED W/AN ESTIMATED BLOOD LOSS OF 3500-4200 CC'S. SHE WAS TREATED W/MULTIPLE BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS. AT THE TIME OF EXPLANT AND REPAIR OF THE VENA CAVA, A BONE SCREW WAS PLACED. FIFTEEN DAYS POST EXPLANT, PT READMITTED W/BLOOD CLOTS IN BOTH LEGS AND THE INFERIOR VENA CAVA. SHE WAS HOSPITALIZED THIS TIME FOR APPROX 4 WEEKS. SHE WAS HEPARINIZED INITIALLY AND THEN PLACED ON COUMADIN. SHE HAD NG TUBE PLACED AND UNDERWENT A GREENFIELD VENA CAVA FILTER PLACEMENT. SHE SUBSEQUENTLY SUFFERED FURTHER EMBOLI AND IS NOW LEGALLY DISABLED WITH NO PERIPHERAL VISION DUE TO AN "EMBOLISM TO THE EYE." SHE WILL REMAIN ON MEDICATION. SHE REPORTS SHE HAS NEVER RECEIVED A RETURN CALL WHEN TRYING TO REACH MFR REP. SHE ALSO STATES THAT THIS DEVICE WAS NOT APPROVED FOR USE IN THE SPINE. RPTR IS FRUSTRATED THAT HER IMPLANTING PHYSICIAN "SHOWED HER A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT DEVICE ON THE BROCHURE" AND THAT IF SHE HAD KNOWN THE PROCEDURE WAS UNAPPROVED, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE HAD IT. SHE ALSO QUESTIONS HOW HER PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GET THE INSURANCE CO TO PAY FOR THE PROCEDURE WHEN IT IS UNAPPROVED.