N ANTISERUM TO HUMAN-IG/L-CHAIN, K TYPE
Received Jun 25, 2025 · Event occurred Jun 6, 2025
Report 9610806-2025-00023 · MDR key 22325552
Device
Generic name
Kappa, Antigen, Antiserum, Control
Manufacturer
Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbhCatalog number
10446594
Lot number
122119
Product problems
- Low Test Results
- Low Test Results
Patient
71 YR · Male
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
Narrative
Description of Event or Problem
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THE OBSERVATION OF A FALSELY DEPRESSED KAPPA RESULT OBTAINED ON ONE PATIENT SERUM SAMPLE MEASURED WITH N ANTISERUM TO HUMAN IG/L-CHAIN, TYPE LOT: 122119 ON THE BNII SYSTEM. THERE ARE NO KNOWN REPORTS OF PATIENT INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE HEALTH CONSEQUENCES DUE TO THE DISCORDANT RESULT.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
AN OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES (OUS) CUSTOMER CONTACTED A SIEMENS REGIONAL SUPPORT CENTER TO REPORT THE OBSERVATION OF A DISCORDANT KAPPA SERUM SAMPLE RESULT ON A BNII INSTRUMENT. QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS WERE WITHIN ACCEPTABLE RANGES ON THE DAY OF TESTING. PER THE INTENDED USE SECTION OF THE N ANTISERUM TO HUMAN-IG/L-CHAIN, K TYPE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU): "RESULTS OF THE KAPPA MEASUREMENT SHOULD ALWAYS BE INTERPRETED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER LABORATORY FINDINGS." SIEMENS IS INVESTIGATING. NOTE: THE N ANTISERUM TO HUMAN-IG/L-CHAIN, K TYPE REAGENT IS MARKETED IN THE UNITED STATES UNDER SIEMENS MATERIAL NUMBER: 10446595. THE 510(K) NUMBER DOCUMENTED IN SECTION G4 IS FOR THE US PRODUCT.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
SIEMENS FILED THE INITIAL MDR ON 25-JUN-2025. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 16-JUL-2025: SIEMENS REVIEWED THE INFORMATION PROVIDED AND DATA OBTAINED. BASED ON THE DATA ANALYSIS, THERE WAS NO INDICATION OF A SYSTEM RELATED ISSUE. BASED ON THE REVIEW OF INFORMATION PROVIDED, THE PROBABLE CAUSE OF THE DISCORDANT KAPPA RESULT FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH N ANTISERUM TO HUMAN IG/L-CHAIN, TYPE LOT: 122119 ON THE BN II COULD NOT BE IDENTIFIED. NO OTHER DISCORDANT RESULTS WERE OBTAINED FOR METHOD KAPPA WITH OTHER PATIENTS. CALIBRATION DATA WAS ACCEPTABLE. THE QC PERFORMANCE COULD NOT BE EVALUATED DUE TO THE LACK OF DATA. THE INFORMATION PROVIDED INDICATES A SAMPLE SPECIFIC OBSERVATION FOR ONE SINGLE PATIENT SAMPLE. NO GENERAL PERFORMANCE ISSUE FOR METHOD KAPPA WAS IDENTIFIED THROUGH THE DATA ANALYSIS. THE INSTRUMENT IS PERFORMING ACCORDING TO SPECIFICATIONS. NO FURTHER EVALUATION OF THIS DEVICE IS REQUIRED. IN SECTION H6, THE INVESTIGATION FINDINGS AND INVESTIGATION CONCLUSIONS CODES WERE UPDATED.