GHIATAS
Received Mar 5, 2024 · Event occurred Jan 18, 2024
Report 2020394-2024-00310 · MDR key 18836180
Device
Generic name
Breast Localization Wire
Manufacturer
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.Catalog number
UNKNOWN GHIATAS
Lot number
UNKNOWN
Product problems
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
Patient
NA · Unknown
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
Narrative
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: AS THE LOT NUMBER FOR THE DEVICE WAS NOT PROVIDED, A REVIEW OF THE DEVICE HISTORY RECORDS COULD NOT BE PERFORMED. THE SAMPLE WAS NOT RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INSPECTION/EVALUATION. THEREFORE, THE INVESTIGATION OF THE REPORTED EVENT IS INCONCLUSIVE. BASED UPON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THE DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE FOR THIS EVENT IS UNKNOWN. THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) IS ADEQUATE FOR THE REPORTED DEVICE/PATIENT CODE(S) AND PROVIDES GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE, AS WELL AS WARNINGS, PRECAUTIONS AND POTENTIAL COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVICE. UPON RECEIPT OF NEW OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, A FOLLOW-UP REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED AS APPLICABLE. H11: SECTION A THROUGH F: THE INFORMATION PROVIDE BY BD REPRESENTS ALL THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT/REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BD. H3 OTHER TEXT : DEVICE NOT RETURNED.
Description of Event or Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A LOCALIZATION WIRE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO HAVE A FINE HAIRS AND DEBRIS ON THE INTRODUCER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Description of Event or Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO A BREAST LOCALIZATION WIRE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE NEEDLE WAS ALLEGEDLY FOUND TO HAVE FINE HAIRS AND DEBRIS ON THE INTRODUCER. THERE WAS NO PATIENT CONTACT.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H10: MANUFACTURING REVIEW: A MANUFACTURING REVIEW WAS NOT REQUESTED AS THE LOT NUMBER REPORTED IS UNKNOWN. INVESTIGATION SUMMARY: THE PHYSICAL DEVICE WAS NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION. NO PHOTOS WERE PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. THEREFORE, THE INVESTIGATION IS INCONCLUSIVE FOR THE REPORTED FAILURE AS NO OBJECTIVE EVIDENCE WAS PROVIDED FOR REVIEW. A DEFINITIVE ROOT CAUSE FOR THE REPORTED DEVICE CONTAMINATION WITH CHEMICAL OR OTHER MATERIALS COULD NOT BE DETERMINED BASED UPON THE PROVIDED INFORMATION. LABELING REVIEW: AS THE REPORTED EVENT DID NOT ALLEGE A LABELING OR USE RELATED ISSUE, A LABELING REVIEW IS NOT REQUIRED. H11: SECTION A THROUGH F: THE INFORMATION PROVIDE BY BD REPRESENTS ALL THE KNOWN INFORMATION AT THIS TIME. DESPITE GOOD FAITH EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THE COMPLAINANT/REPORTER WAS UNABLE OR UNWILLING TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER PATIENT, PRODUCT, OR PROCEDURAL DETAILS TO BD.