SUNMED LLC
Received Jan 26, 2024 · Event occurred Jun 20, 2023
Report 1314417-2024-00005 · MDR key 18592411
Device
Generic name
Ventilator, Emergency, Manual (resuscitator
Manufacturer
Sunmed Holdings LlcModel number
2422-BVMPADCatalog number
2422-BVMPAD
Lot number
UNKNOWN
Product problems
- Pressure Problem
- Pressure Problem
Patient
NA · Unknown
- Decreased Level of Consciousness
- Decreased Level of Consciousness
Narrative
Description of Event or Problem
PATIENT PRESENTATION: AN UNRESPONSIVE PATIENT, DISCOVERED IN A FIELD AND EXHIBITING HYPERTHERMIA, WAS ASSESSED WITH A GLASGOW COMA SCALE (GCS) SCORE OF 7, INDICATIVE OF SEVERE CONSCIOUSNESS IMPAIRMENT. MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS: RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION (RSI) WAS PERFORMED TO ESTABLISH AIRWAY PATENCY. THE ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) WAS VENTILATED WITH AN ADULT CURAPLEX (2422-BVMPAD) MANUAL RESUSCITATOR EQUIPPED WITH A MANOMETER, POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (PEEP) VALVE SET AT 15 CMH2O, HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGE FILTER (HMFE}, IN-LINE END-TIDAL CO2 (ETCO2) SENSOR AND CONNECTED TO A 15 L/MIN OXYGEN SOURCE. FIC02 ELEVATION ISSUE: WHILE USING THE CURAPLEX MANUAL RESUSCITATOR, THE PATIENT'S FRACTION OF INSPIRED CO2 (FICO2) LEVELS INCREASED UNTIL THE CLINICAL TEAM PLACED THE PATIENT ON A VENTILATOR. THIS INCREASE BEGAN AT 20:09.42 (FIGURE 1) AND REACHED A PEAK OF 22 MMHG AT 20:15.03 (FIGURE 2). FICO2 LEVELS FLUCTUATED BETWEEN 5 AND 15 MMHG (FIGURE 3) UNTIL THE PATIENT WAS TRANSITIONED TO A VENTILATOR AT 20:19.22. THE ELEVATION IN FICO2 RESOLVED ONCE THE VENTILATOR WAS INITIATED (FIGURE 4). PRODUCT PROBLEM: SUSPICIONS ARISE THAT THE MANUAL RESUSCITATOR MAY BE THE SOURCE OF THE ABNORMAL FIC02 ELEVATION. THE FIC02 INCREASE POSES A RISK OF HYPERCAPNIA, WHICH CAN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE PATIENT'S BODILY FUNCTIONS, PHYSICAL WELL-BEING, AND POTENTIALLY LEAD TO LIFE-THREATENING CONSEQUENCES. FURTHERMORE, THIS INCONSISTENCY RAISES CONCERNS REGARDING ADHERENCE TO PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS AND USER EXPECTATIONS. PATIENT OUTCOME: THE PATIENTS OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN, AS CARE WAS HANDED OVER TO ANOTHER PROVIDER.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
THE MANUAL RESUSCITATOR MAY BE THE SOURCE OF ABNORMAL FICO2 ELEVATION. THIS IS THE ISSUE THAT WAS REFERRED TO IN THE FIELD NOTIFICATION INITIATED ON OCT 11, 2023. IN ADDITION, THE FDA MEDWATCH REPORT WAS RECEIVED. THE COMPLAINT OF "THE MANUAL RESUSCITATOR MAY BE THE SOURCE OF ABNORMAL FICO2 ELEVATION" REGARDING PART 2442-BVMPAD WAS CONFIRMED TO BE ASSOCIATED WITH NCMR-02506. A RESOLUTION LETTER WAS NOT REQUESTED BY THE CUSTOMER.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
THE MANUAL RESUSCITATOR MAY BE THE SOURCE OF ABNORMAL FICO2 ELEVATION. THIS IS THE ISSUE THAT WAS REFERRED TO IN THE FIELD NOTIFICATION INITIATED ON OCT 11, 2023. IN ADDITION, THE FDA MEDWATCH REPORT WAS RECEIVED.
Description of Event or Problem
PATIENT PRESENTATION: AN UNRESPONSIVE PATIENT, DISCOVERED IN A FIELD AND EXHIBITING HYPERTHERMIA, WAS ASSESSED WITH A GLASGOW COMA SCALE (GCS) SCORE OF 7, INDICATIVE OF SEVERE CONSCIOUSNESS IMPAIRMENT. MEDICAL INTERVENTIONS: RAPID SEQUENCE INTUBATION (RSI) WAS PERFORMED TO ESTABLISH AIRWAY PATENCY. THE ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE (ETT) WAS VENTILATED WITH AN ADULT CURAPLEX (2422-BVMPAD) MANUAL RESUSCITATOR EQUIPPED WITH A MANOMETER, POSITIVE END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE (PEEP) VALVE SET AT 15 CMH2O, HEAT AND MOISTURE EXCHANGE FILTER (HMFE}, IN-LINE END-TIDAL CO2 (ETCO2) SENSOR AND CONNECTED TO A 15 L/MIN OXYGEN SOURCE. FIC02 ELEVATION ISSUE: WHILE USING THE CURAPLEX MANUAL RESUSCITATOR, THE PATIENT'S FRACTION OF INSPIRED CO2 (FICO2) LEVELS INCREASED UNTIL THE CLINICAL TEAM PLACED THE PATIENT ON A VENTILATOR. THIS INCREASE BEGAN AT 20:09.42 (FIGURE 1) AND REACHED A PEAK OF 22 MMHG AT 20:15.03 (FIGURE 2). FICO2 LEVELS FLUCTUATED BETWEEN 5 AND 15 MMHG (FIGURE 3) UNTIL THE PATIENT WAS TRANSITIONED TO A VENTILATOR AT 20:19.22. THE ELEVATION IN FICO2 RESOLVED ONCE THE VENTILATOR WAS INITIATED (FIGURE 4). PRODUCT PROBLEM: SUSPICIONS ARISE THAT THE MANUAL RESUSCITATOR MAY BE THE SOURCE OF THE ABNORMAL FIC02 ELEVATION. THE FIC02 INCREASE POSES A RISK OF HYPERCAPNIA, WHICH CAN SIGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE PATIENT'S BODILY FUNCTIONS, PHYSICAL WELL-BEING, AND POTENTIALLY LEAD TO LIFE-THREATENING CONSEQUENCES. FURTHERMORE, THIS INCONSISTENCY RAISES CONCERNS REGARDING ADHERENCE TO PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS AND USER EXPECTATIONS. PATIENT OUTCOME: THE PATIENTS OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN, AS CARE WAS HANDED OVER TO ANOTHER PROVIDER.