inforMED
InjuryQAD

PHOTODYNAMIC BONE STABILIZATION SYSTEM

Received Apr 26, 2023 · Event occurred Aug 9, 2022

Report 3006845464-2023-00030 · MDR key 16820829

Device

Generic name

In Vivo Intrameduillary Fixation Rod

Model number

USSL-2213240

Catalog number

USSL-2213240

Lot number

410632

Product problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

Patient

66 YR · Male

  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture
  • Nonunion/Delayed-union Bone Fracture

Narrative

Additional Manufacturer Narrative

RETURNED PRODUCT EVALUATION: NO DEVICE WAS RETURNED FOR EVALUATION BECAUSE THE IMPLANT REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THE PATIENT. DHR REVIEW: A REVIEW OF THE MANUFACTURING RECORDS FOR THIS DEVICE FOUND THAT IT WAS IN SPECIFICATION AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE AND RELEASE. MEDICAL OVERSIGHT REVIEW THE FIRM CONDUCTED A MEDICAL OVERSIGHT REVIEW OF THE RADIOGRAPHS AND COMPLAINT INFORMATION FROM THE REGISTRY. IT WAS OBSERVED THAT: · AT 4 MONHTS WHEN THE NON-UNION WAS DIAGNOSED, THE PLATE, SCREWS AND BOTH ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS WERE INTACT AND DID NOT APPEAR TO HAVE ANY MOVEMENT. THE REDUCTION WAS STILL RELATIVELY ANATOMIC, AND THAT THERE WAS NO ILLUMINOSS IMPLANT FAILURE OR BREAK, AND NO ANCILLARY HARDWARE FAILURE OR BREAK. · THE PATIENT HAS SIGNIFICANT KNEE ARTHRITIS WHICH MAY HAVE CAUSED THEM PAIN, AND THERE WAS INCOMPLETE HEALING OF THE MEDIAL CORTEX · THE FRACTURE WAS RIGIDLY FIXED DUE TO THE PLATE, MULTIPLE SCREWS AND TWO ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS. · THE ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS APPEAR TO HAVE SUFFICIENT INTERMEDULLARY WALL CONTACT AND SPAN THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE FRACTURE. THE PLATE AND SCREWS APPEAR TO BE CAPTURING THE ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS TO PROVIDE A STABLE FIXATION. · IN THIS CASE, THE ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS SUCCESSFULLY PROVIDED SUPPLEMENTAL MECHANICAL STABILITY TO THE PLATE AND SCREWS, AS THERE WAS NO HARDWARE MOVEMENT OBSERVED, AND THE SCREWS REMAINED IN PLACE AS THEY HAD PURCHASE IN THE ILLUMINOSS IMPLANT. FOLLOW UP INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE USER: THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN AT THE 4 MONTH FOLLOW UP VISIT SO THE USER PERFORMED A CT. BASED ON THE CT A NONUNION WAS DIAGNOSED, FOR WHICH THE REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED. THE USER SPECULATED THAT A CONTRIBUTOR TO THE NONUNION MAY HAVE BEEN THAT HE USED TWO ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS WITH A LARGE PLATE AND THE CONSTRUCT MAY HAVE BEEN TOO STIFF. LITERATURE REVIEW: · FRACTURE NON-UNIONS CAN BE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO BY MULTIPLE FACTORS INCLUDING: INSUFFICIENT BLOOD SUPPLY TO THE FRACTURE SITE WHICH BOTH DECREASES OSTEOGENIC CELLS AND DECREASES BIOLOGIC GROWTH FACTORS TO THE BONE, DAMAGE TO THE OSTEOCONDUCTIVE SCAFFOLD CAUSING THE DISTANCE NEEDED TO HEAL BONE TO BE SIGNIFICANT, AND POOR MECHANICAL STABILITY AT THE FRACTURE SITE. RISK FACTORS FOR FRACTURE NONUNIONS INCLUDE: NUTRITIONAL STATUS, DIABETES, SMOKING, VASCULAR DISEASE, RENAL SUFFICIENCY AND USE OF NSAIDS OR STEROIDS. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT POOR MECHANICAL STABILITY AT THE FRACTURE SITE CONTRIBUTED TO THE NONUNION, AS THE INITIAL FIXATION APPEARED SOUND AND THE IMPLANTS USED TO STABILIZE THE FRACTURE WERE IN THE SAME POSITION AT 4 MONTHS POST OP AND THE REDUCTION REMAINED RELATIVELY ANATOMIC. · THE USER POSITED THAT THE CONSTRUCT THEY USED TO STABILIZE THE FRACTURE MAY HAVE BEEN TOO STIFF, WHICH MAY HAVE RESULTED IN THE NONUNION. STRESS SHIELDING CAN OCCUR WHEN RIGID IMPLANTS ARE USED TO REPAIR FRACTURES IN WHICH THE HIGHER STIFFNESS OF THE IMPLANT RESULTS IN A DECREASED PHYSIOLOGICAL LOADING ON THE BONE AND CAN RESULT IN BONE LOSS OR POORER BONE HEALING. CONCLUSION THE ILLUMINOSS DEVICES WERE INTACT, IN PLACE, AND SECURELY PROVIDING SUPPLEMENTAL FIXATION TO THE PLATE VIA THE SECURE SCREW PLACEMENT INTO THE ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS. THE POSSIBLE CAUSES OF THE NONUNION IN THIS CASE INCLUDE AN INSUFFICIENT BLOOD SUPPLY, DAMAGE TO THE OSTEOCONDUCTIVE CONSTRUCT CAUSING THE DISTANCE TO HEAL THE BONE TO BE SIGNIFICANT, OR STRESS SHIELDING DUE TO THE HIGHER STIFFNESS OF THE IMPLANT CONSTRUCT THAN THE BONE. THE SPECIFIC CAUSE OF THE NONUNION AND RESULTING REVISION SURGERY IN THIS CASE CANNOT BE DETERMINED.

Description of Event or Problem

AN ADVERSE EVENT WAS ENTERED INTO THE ILLUMINOSS CLINICAL STUDY REGISTRY ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR AN EVENT WHICH OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2022. ON (B)(6) 2022 , A PATIENT WAS TREATED FOR A PERIPROSETHETIC FEMUR FRACTURE WITH TWO ILLUMINOSS IMPLANTS AND A PLATE AND SCREWS. THE PATIENT WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A NON-UNION OF THE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURE ON (B)(6) 2022 , AND RECEIVED REVISION SURGERY - ORIF WITH BONE GRAFTING AND MEDIAL PLATING- ON (B)(6) 2022.